WEBVTT
X-TIMESTAMP-MAP=LOCAL:00:00:00.000,MPEGTS:63000

1
00:00:00.660 --> 00:00:04.350
<v 0>Cases of police brutality on African-Americans have sparked public uproar.</v>

2
00:00:04.350 --> 00:00:05.670
In recent years, these.

3
00:00:05.670 --> 00:00:09.360
<v 1>Cases have called into question the practice of qualified immunity for police</v>

4
00:00:09.360 --> 00:00:10.193
officers.

5
00:00:11.340 --> 00:00:14.580
Qualified immunity is a type of legal immunity that protects a government

6
00:00:14.580 --> 00:00:16.710
official from civil lawsuits would invoke.

7
00:00:16.800 --> 00:00:20.400
It provides immunity from having to go through the costs of a trial.

8
00:00:20.760 --> 00:00:24.720
The legal concept frequently appears in cases involving police officers,

9
00:00:24.780 --> 00:00:28.320
but it can apply to executive branch officials if applied.

10
00:00:28.320 --> 00:00:32.100
<v 0>It shields officers from liability for all actions taken on the job,</v>

11
00:00:32.130 --> 00:00:35.040
except those that violate clearly established law.

12
00:00:35.220 --> 00:00:39.300
The Supreme court invoked qualified immunity dating as far back as 1967,

13
00:00:39.420 --> 00:00:43.290
its rationale was to allow officials to perform their duties without fear of

14
00:00:43.290 --> 00:00:46.920
constantly defending themselves against claims for damages. In other words,

15
00:00:46.920 --> 00:00:50.910
it was to allow those acting in good faith to carry out their job without

16
00:00:50.910 --> 00:00:51.743
deterrence.

17
00:00:51.930 --> 00:00:54.420
<v 1>In 2015, the court ruled that California.</v>

18
00:00:54.420 --> 00:00:58.050
<v 0>Police were entitled to qualified immunity after they forcibly entered the room</v>

19
00:00:58.050 --> 00:01:01.890
of a woman with a mental disability and shot her. In another example,

20
00:01:02.100 --> 00:01:06.030
the court granted qualified immunity to a university of Arizona police officer.

21
00:01:06.360 --> 00:01:10.020
After he shot a woman who refused to drop a knife in her driveway,

22
00:01:10.380 --> 00:01:14.700
a recent investigation by Reuters uncovered that appeals courts grant qualified

23
00:01:14.700 --> 00:01:16.860
immunity to police much more than they used to.

24
00:01:17.280 --> 00:01:21.120
The Supreme court may decide to reconsider the doctrine. Associate justice.

25
00:01:21.120 --> 00:01:25.200
Sonia sat on my arm called it an absolute shield for police officers accused of

26
00:01:25.200 --> 00:01:27.570
excessive force and associate justice.

27
00:01:27.570 --> 00:01:31.500
Clarence Thomas complained that the doctrine has no historical basis.

28
00:01:31.650 --> 00:01:33.180
Even if the justices weigh in,

29
00:01:33.360 --> 00:01:36.720
it's not clear whether they would abolish qualified immunity or even

30
00:01:36.720 --> 00:01:38.000
significantly scale it. Yeah.